What’s the deal with those butter cookies that come in tins that you only see around Christmas time? How old are they really? I mean REALLY?
Charlie sexually harassed those cookies.
What’s the deal with those butter cookies that come in tins that you only see around Christmas time? How old are they really? I mean REALLY?
Charlie sexually harassed those cookies.
Today, we posted a correction to a post from yesterday. We regret to inform you that the correction contained inaccurate information. We did not “got distracted by Heroes”. Heroes’ “Villains” story arc completed on December 15 in a rousing ode to freedom, and did not air on Monday. Instead, we read Time Out magazine quietly on the couch and got shushed for making too much noise and for watching Rachel Maddow too loud on MSNBC.
We regret the errors.
Yesterday, CharlieTuEats posted a bloggy exhaustingly cataloguing a dinner at Chestnut titled Fill me up, fill me up. This post was very false. Charlie Tu did not eat this meal and has never eaten, nor likely every will eat, a tasting menu at this restaurant. It should not have been blogged.
Doing so violated both our loose standards and our skillz in publishing actual dining experiences of Charlie Tu. We have already expressed our regrets to Charlie Tu and we are now doing the same to you, our readers.
The post, like most posts these days, arrived by Hello Kitty herself. It is Charlie Tu Eats procedure to verify the authenticity of every nibbly. In this case, Charlie Tu Eats sent an edited version of the letter to the sender of the email and did not hear back. At that point, we should have contacted Hello Kitty’s office to verify that she (he?) had, in fact, written to us.
We did not do that. (We got distracted by Heroes.) Without that verification, the bloggy should never have been printed. We are reviewing our procedures for verifying Hello Kitty’s reports to avoid such an incident in the future. Bon appy!
